On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 21:03 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 6/20/21 8:56 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > > On 6/20/21 8:05 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote: > > > > > > > It's not really an error. Maybe IO_APOLL_ABORTED or so? > > fwiw, I mean totally replacing *_ERR, not only this return > this is how I understood the remark. I will change it as you suggested
