Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: reduce latency by reissueing the operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 21:08 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/20/21 9:01 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 6/20/21 12:28 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 12:07 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > On 6/20/21 12:05 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > > > > -               return false;
> > > > > +               return ret?IO_ARM_POLL_READY:IO_ARM_POLL_ERR;
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Please make that return expression more readable.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > How exactly?
> > > 
> > > by adding spaces?
> > > Changing the define names??
> > 
> > Adding spaces would be sufficient IMO (like Pavel suggested also).
> 
> Agree. That should be in the code style somewhere
> 
Sure no problem.

This hasn't been reported by checkpatch.pl but I have just discovered
codespell... Maybe this addon reports more issues than vanilla
checkpatch





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux