We don't need a full copy of tctx->task_list in tctx_task_work(), but
only a first one, so just assign node directly.
Taking into account that task_works are run in a context of a task,
it's very unlikely to first see non-empty tctx->task_list and then
splice it empty, can only happen with task_work cancellations that is
not-normal slow path anyway. Hence, get rid of the check in the end,
it's there not for validity but "performance" purposes.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f31f00c6e829..31afe25596d7 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1897,15 +1897,13 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
clear_bit(0, &tctx->task_state);
while (!wq_list_empty(&tctx->task_list)) {
- struct io_wq_work_list list;
struct io_wq_work_node *node;
spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- list = tctx->task_list;
+ node = tctx->task_list.first;
INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- node = list.first;
while (node) {
struct io_wq_work_node *next = node->next;
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
@@ -1919,9 +1917,6 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
req->task_work.func(&req->task_work);
node = next;
}
-
- if (!list.first)
- break;
cond_resched();
}
--
2.31.1
