On 06/14, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I would very much like some clarity on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL. At the very > least it would be nice if it could get renamed TIF_NOTIFY_TASK_WORK. No, no, no ;) I think that, for example, freezer should be changed to use set_notify_signal() rather than fake_signal_wake_up(). Livepatch. And probably it will have more users. > I don't understand the logic with well enough of adding work to > non-io_uring threads with task_work_add to understand why that happens > in the first place. Same here. Oleg.
