On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 12:03:38PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > You surely made your point that this is well thought out. > > Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first > version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting > feedback on the basic design and the different use cases. You *completely* failed to describe any. I'm with tglx; I see no reason to even look at the patches. If you don't have a problem, you don't need a solution.