Re: [PATCH 13/23] io_uring: implement bpf prog registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/21/21 12:45 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>> On May 19, 2021, at 7:13 AM, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [de]register BPF programs through io_uring_register() with new
>> IORING_ATTACH_BPF and IORING_DETACH_BPF commands.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c                 | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h |  2 +
>> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 882b16b5e5eb..b13cbcd5c47b 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
>> #include <linux/task_work.h>
>> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>> #include <linux/io_uring.h>
>> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
>>
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/io_uring.h>
>> @@ -103,6 +104,8 @@
>> #define IORING_MAX_RESTRICTIONS	(IORING_RESTRICTION_LAST + \
>> 				 IORING_REGISTER_LAST + IORING_OP_LAST)
>>
>> +#define IORING_MAX_BPF_PROGS	100
> 
> Is 100 a realistic number here? 

Arbitrary test value, will update

> 
>> +
>> #define SQE_VALID_FLAGS	(IOSQE_FIXED_FILE|IOSQE_IO_DRAIN|IOSQE_IO_LINK|	\
>> 				IOSQE_IO_HARDLINK | IOSQE_ASYNC | \
>> 				IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT)
>> @@ -266,6 +269,10 @@ struct io_restriction {
>> 	bool registered;
>> };
>>
> 
> [...]
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux