On 5/2/21 4:01 PM, Palash Oswal wrote: > On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 4:04 PM Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I tested against the HEAD b1ef997bec4d5cf251bfb5e47f7b04afa49bcdfe >> >> However, there is a bunch patches fixing sqpoll cancellations in >> 5.13, all are waiting for backporting. and for-next doesn't trigger >> the issue for me. >> >> Are you absolutely sure b1ef997bec4d5cf251bfb5e47f7b04afa49bcdfe >> does hit it? >> >>> commit on for-next tree >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/?h=for-next >>> and the reproducer fails. > > Hi Pavel and Hillf, > > I believe there's a little misunderstanding, apologies. The reproducer > does not trigger the bug on the for-next tree which has patches for > 5.13. The reproducer process exits correctly. Likely one of those > commits that will be back-ported to 5.12 will address this issue. > When I wrote `the reproducer fails`, I meant to indicate that the bug > is not triggered on for-next. I will word it better next time! I see, great it's clarified -- Pavel Begunkov
