On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:10:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 02:16:41PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > On 16/04/2021 05:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:22:51AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > >> Add percpu_ref_atomic_count(), which returns number of references of a
> > >> percpu_ref switched prior into atomic mode, so the caller is responsible
> > >> to make sure it's in the right mode.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >> include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 1 +
> > >> lib/percpu-refcount.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
> > >> index 16c35a728b4c..0ff40e79efa2 100644
> > >> --- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
> > >> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(struct percpu_ref *ref,
> > >> void percpu_ref_resurrect(struct percpu_ref *ref);
> > >> void percpu_ref_reinit(struct percpu_ref *ref);
> > >> bool percpu_ref_is_zero(struct percpu_ref *ref);
> > >> +unsigned long percpu_ref_atomic_count(struct percpu_ref *ref);
> > >>
> > >> /**
> > >> * percpu_ref_kill - drop the initial ref
> > >> diff --git a/lib/percpu-refcount.c b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
> > >> index a1071cdefb5a..56286995e2b8 100644
> > >> --- a/lib/percpu-refcount.c
> > >> +++ b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
> > >> @@ -425,6 +425,32 @@ bool percpu_ref_is_zero(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> > >> }
> > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_is_zero);
> > >>
> > >> +/**
> > >> + * percpu_ref_atomic_count - returns number of left references
> > >> + * @ref: percpu_ref to test
> > >> + *
> > >> + * This function is safe to call as long as @ref is switch into atomic mode,
> > >> + * and is between init and exit.
> > >> + */
> > >> +unsigned long percpu_ref_atomic_count(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> > >> +{
> > >> + unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
> > >> + unsigned long count, flags;
> > >> +
> > >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count)))
> > >> + return -1UL;
> > >> +
> > >> + /* protect us from being destroyed */
> > >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&percpu_ref_switch_lock, flags);
> > >> + if (ref->data)
> > >> + count = atomic_long_read(&ref->data->count);
> > >> + else
> > >> + count = ref->percpu_count_ptr >> __PERCPU_REF_FLAG_BITS;
> > >
> > > Sorry I missed Jens' patch before and also the update to percpu_ref.
> > > However, I feel like I'm missing something. This isn't entirely related
> > > to your patch, but I'm not following why percpu_count_ptr stores the
> > > excess count of an exited percpu_ref and doesn't warn when it's not
> > > zero. It seems like this should be an error if it's not 0?
> > >
> > > Granted we have made some contract with the user to do the right thing,
> > > but say someone does mess up, we don't indicate to them hey this ref is
> > > actually dead and if they're waiting for it to go to 0, it never will.
> >
> > fwiw, I copied is_zero, but skimming through the code don't immediately
> > see myself why it is so...
> >
> > Cc Ming, he split out some parts of it to dynamic allocation not too
> > long ago, maybe he knows the trick.
>
> I remembered that percpu_ref_is_zero() can be called even after percpu_ref_exit()
> returns, and looks percpu_ref_is_zero() isn't classified into 'active use'.
>
Looking at the commit prior, it seems like percpu_ref_is_zero() was
subject to the usual init and exit lifetime. I guess I'm just not
convinced it should ever be > 0. I'll think about it a little longer and
might fix it.
Thanks,
Dennis
