Re: [PATCH for-5.13] io_uring: maintain drain requests' logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2021/4/1 上午6:06, Pavel Begunkov 写道:


On 31/03/2021 10:01, Hao Xu wrote:
Now that we have multishot poll requests, one sqe can emit multiple
cqes. given below example:
     sqe0(multishot poll)-->sqe1-->sqe2(drain req)
sqe2 is designed to issue after sqe0 and sqe1 completed, but since sqe0
is a multishot poll request, sqe2 may be issued after sqe0's event
triggered twice before sqe1 completed. This isn't what users leverage
drain requests for.
Here a simple solution is to ignore all multishot poll cqes, which means
drain requests  won't wait those request to be done.

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/io_uring.c | 9 +++++++--
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 513096759445..cd6d44cf5940 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
  	struct callback_head		*exit_task_work;
struct wait_queue_head hash_wait;
+	unsigned                        multishot_cqes;
/* Keep this last, we don't need it for the fast path */
  	struct work_struct		exit_work;
@@ -1181,8 +1182,8 @@ static bool req_need_defer(struct io_kiocb *req, u32 seq)
  	if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)) {
  		struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- return seq != ctx->cached_cq_tail
-				+ READ_ONCE(ctx->cached_cq_overflow);
+		return seq + ctx->multishot_cqes != ctx->cached_cq_tail
+			+ READ_ONCE(ctx->cached_cq_overflow);
  	}
return false;
@@ -4897,6 +4898,7 @@ static bool io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask, int error)
  {
  	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
  	unsigned flags = IORING_CQE_F_MORE;
+	bool multishot_poll = !(req->poll.events & EPOLLONESHOT);
if (!error && req->poll.canceled) {
  		error = -ECANCELED;
@@ -4911,6 +4913,9 @@ static bool io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask, int error)
  		req->poll.done = true;
  		flags = 0;
  	}
+	if (multishot_poll)
+		ctx->multishot_cqes++;
+

We need to make sure we do that only for a non-final complete, i.e.
not killing request, otherwise it'll double account the last one.
Hi Pavel, I saw a killing request like iopoll_remove or async_cancel call io_cqring_fill_event() to create an ECANCELED cqe for the original poll request. So there could be cases like(even for single poll request):
  (1). add poll --> cancel poll, an ECANCELED cqe.
                                                  1sqe:1cqe   all good
(2). add poll --> trigger event(queued to task_work) --> cancel poll, an ECANCELED cqe --> task_work runs, another ECANCELED cqe.
                                                  1sqe:2cqes
I suggest we shall only emit one ECANCELED cqe.
Currently I only account cqe through io_poll_complete(), so ECANCELED cqe from io_poll_remove or async_cancel etc are not counted in.
E.g. is failed __io_cqring_fill_event() in io_poll_complete() fine?
Other places?
a failed __io_cqring_fill_event() doesn't produce a cqe but increment ctx->cached_cq_overflow, as long as a cqe is produced or cached_cq_overflow is +=1, it is ok.

Btw, we can use some tests :)
I'll do more tests.


  	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
  	return !(flags & IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
  }






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux