On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:34 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A quick skim shows that these threads are not showing up anywhere in > proc which appears to be a problem, as it hides them from top. > > Sysadmins need the ability to dig into a system and find out where all > their cpu usage or io's have gone when there is a problem. I general I > think this argues that these threads should show up as threads of the > process so I am not even certain this is the right fix to deal with gdb. Yeah, I do think that hiding them is the wrong model, because it also hides them from "ps" etc, which is very wrong. I don't know what the gdb logic is, but maybe there's some other option that makes gdb not react to them? Linus