On 3/25/21 7:44 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 25/03/2021 11:33, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> Hi Jens, Hi Pavel, >> I was taking a look at the new SQPOLL handling with io_thread instead of kthread. Great job! Really nice feature that maybe can be reused also in other scenarios (e.g. vhost). >> >> Regarding SQPOLL, IIUC these new threads are much closer to user threads, so is there still a need to require CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_NICE to enable SQPOLL? > > Hmm, good question. If there are under same cgroup (should be in > theory), and if we add more scheduling points (i.e. need_resched()), and > don't see a reason why not. Jens? > > Better not right away though. IMHO it's safer to let the change settle > down for some time. Yes, agree on both counts - we are not going to need elevated privileges going forward, but I'd also rather defer making that change until 5.13 so we have a bit more time on the current (new) base first. -- Jens Axboe
