On 3/24/21 8:40 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> We are safe with overflows in io_sqe_buffer_register() because it will
> only yield allocation failure, but it's nicer to check explicitly.
Right, either that or fault when mapping. So nothing serious here, but
would be nice to clean up though and just explicitly make it return
-EOVERFLOW when that is the case.
> @@ -8306,6 +8306,8 @@ static int io_buffers_map_alloc(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr_args)
>
> static int io_buffer_validate(struct iovec *iov)
> {
> + u64 tmp, acct_len = iov->iov_len + (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
No need for those parens.
> /*
> * Don't impose further limits on the size and buffer
> * constraints here, we'll -EINVAL later when IO is
> @@ -8318,6 +8320,9 @@ static int io_buffer_validate(struct iovec *iov)
> if (iov->iov_len > SZ_1G)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + if (check_add_overflow((u64)iov->iov_base, acct_len, &tmp))
> + return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
Is this right for 32-bit?
--
Jens Axboe
