Re: [PATCH 0/2] send[msg]()/recv[msg]() fixes/improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pavel,

>>> here're patches which fix linking of send[msg]()/recv[msg]() calls
>>> and make sure io_uring_enter() never generate a SIGPIPE.
> 
> 1/2 breaks userspace.

Can you explain that a bit please, how could some application ever
have a useful use of IOSQE_IO_LINK with these socket calls?

> Sounds like 2/2 might too, does it?

Do you think any application really expects to get a SIGPIPE
when calling io_uring_enter()?

metze




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux