On 10/03/2021 04:10, Hillf Danton wrote:> > Fix 05ff6c4a0e07 ("io_uring: SQPOLL parking fixes") in the current tree > by removing the extra set of IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP in response to > the arrival of urgent signal because it misleads io_sq_thread_stop(), > though a followup cleanup should go there. That's actually reasonable, just like 8bff1bf8abeda ("io_uring: fix io_sq_offload_create error handling") Are you going to send a patch? > > --- x/fs/io_uring.c > +++ y/fs/io_uring.c > @@ -6689,10 +6689,8 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data) > io_sqd_init_new(sqd); > timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle; > } > - if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) { > - set_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &sqd->state); > + if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) > break; > - } > sqt_spin = false; > cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list); > list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) { > -- Pavel Begunkov