Re: [PATCH RESEND for-next 00/12] 5.13 first batch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/28/21 3:35 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 1-7 are just random stuff
> 8-12 are further cleanups for around prep_async
> 
> based on io_uring-worker.v4, but should apply fine to for-next
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (12):
>   io_uring: avoid taking ctx refs for task-cancel
>   io_uring: reuse io_req_task_queue_fail()
>   io_uring: further deduplicate file slot selection
>   io_uring: add a helper failing not issued requests
>   io_uring: refactor provide/remove buffer locking
>   io_uring: don't restirct issue_flags for io_openat
>   io_uring: use better types for cflags
>   io_uring: refactor out send/recv async setup
>   io_uring: untie alloc_async_data and needs_async_data
>   io_uring: rethink def->needs_async_data
>   io_uring: merge defer_prep() and prep_async()
>   io_uring: simplify io_resubmit_prep()
> 
>  fs/io_uring.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, I've queued this up for 5.13 - I'll most likely rebase this
branch a few times going forward, until we have 5.12 fully settled.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux