Re: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling io_run_task_work*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2021 14:57, Hao Xu wrote:
> This is caused by calling io_run_task_work_sig() to do work under
> uring_lock while the caller io_sqe_files_unregister() already held
> uring_lock.
> we need to check if uring_lock is held by us when doing unlock around
> io_run_task_work_sig() since there are code paths down to that place
> without uring_lock held.

btw, better to prepare it for-5.12, seems it won't apply

> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index efb6d02fea6f..b093977713ee 100644
[...]
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			percpu_ref_resurrect(&data->refs);
> -			reinit_completion(&data->done);
> -			io_sqe_files_set_node(data, backup_node);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			break;
>  	} while (1);

while (ret >= 0) ?

-- 
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux