Re: [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Assuming that I got that right, that means that the pdu information
>> doesn't actually go all the way to the end of the sqe, which currently
>> is just a bunch of padding.  Was that intentional, or does this mean
>> that io_uring_pdu could actually be 8 bytes longer?
> 
> Also correct. The reason is actually kind of stupid, and I think we
> should just fix that up. struct io_uring_cmd should fit within the first
> cacheline of io_kiocb, to avoid bloating that one. But with the members
> in there, it ends up being 8 bytes too big, if we grab those 8 bytes.
> What I think we should do is get rid of ->done, and just have drivers
> call io_uring_cmd_done() instead. We can provide an empty hook for that.
> Then we can reclaim the 8 bytes, and grow the io_uring_cmd to 56 bytes.

Pushed out that version:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=io_uring-fops.v2

which gives you the full 56 bytes for the payload command.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux