Re: [PATCHSET RFC] support RESOLVE_CACHED for statx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/25/21 6:28 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Which ones in particular? Outside of the afs one you looked a below,
>> the rest should all be of the "need to do IO of some sort" and hence
>> -EAGAIN is reasonable.
> 
> Several of them only do the IO conditionally, which was what I reacted
> to in at least cifs.
> 
> But I think it's ok to start out doing it unconditionally, and make it
> fancier if/when/as people notice or care.

Agree, that was the point I was trying to make in the reply. I'd rather
start simpler and talk to folks about improving it, looping in the
relevant developers for that. I'll leave it as-is for now, modulo the
afs one which was definitely just a mistake.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux