Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix io_wqe->work_list corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/18/20 12:26 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> For the first time a req punted to io-wq, we'll initialize io_wq_work's
> list to be NULL, then insert req to io_wqe->work_list. If this req is not
> inserted into tail of io_wqe->work_list, this req's io_wq_work list will
> point to another req's io_wq_work. For splitted bio case, this req maybe
> inserted to io_wqe->work_list repeatedly, once we insert it to tail of
> io_wqe->work_list for the second time, now io_wq_work->list->next will be
> invalid pointer, which then result in many strang error, panic, kernel
> soft-lockup, rcu stall, etc.
> 
> In my vm, kernel doest not have commit cc29e1bf0d63f7 ("block: disable
> iopoll for split bio"), below fio job can reproduce this bug steadily:
> [global]
> name=iouring-sqpoll-iopoll-1
> ioengine=io_uring
> iodepth=128
> numjobs=1
> thread
> rw=randread
> direct=1
> registerfiles=1
> hipri=1
> bs=4m
> size=100M
> runtime=120
> time_based
> group_reporting
> randrepeat=0
> 
> [device]
> directory=/home/feiman.wxg/mntpoint/  # an ext4 mount point
> 
> If we have commit cc29e1bf0d63f7 ("block: disable iopoll for split bio"),
> there will no splitted bio case for polled io, but I think we still to need
> to fix this list corruption, it also should maybe go to stable branchs.
> 
> To fix this corruption, if a req is inserted into tail of io_wqe->work_list,
> initialize req->io_wq_work->list->next to bu NULL.

Applied, and marked for stable.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux