On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:20 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/15/20 4:43 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 5:57 PM Dmitry Kadashev <dkadashev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:45:27AM +0700, Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > >>> This adds mkdirat support to io_uring and is heavily based on recently > >>> added renameat() / unlinkat() support. > >>> > >>> The first patch is preparation with no functional changes, makes > >>> do_mkdirat accept struct filename pointer rather than the user string. > >>> > >>> The second one leverages that to implement mkdirat in io_uring. > >>> > >>> Based on for-5.11/io_uring. > >>> > >>> Dmitry Kadashev (2): > >>> fs: make do_mkdirat() take struct filename > >>> io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKDIRAT > >>> > >>> fs/internal.h | 1 + > >>> fs/io_uring.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> fs/namei.c | 20 ++++++++---- > >>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 + > >>> 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 2.28.0 > >>> > >> > >> Hi Al Viro, > >> > >> Ping. Jens mentioned before that this looks fine by him, but you or > >> someone from fsdevel should approve the namei.c part first. > > > > Another ping. > > > > Jens, you've mentioned the patch looks good to you, and with quite > > similar changes (unlinkat, renameat) being sent for 5.11 is there > > anything that I can do to help this to be accepted (not necessarily > > for 5.11 at this point)? > > Since we're aiming for 5.12 at this point, let's just hold off a bit and > see if Al gets time to ack/review the VFS side of things. There's no > immediate rush. OK, sounds good, thanks. -- Dmitry Kadashev
