Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
From: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:31:42 +0800
Cc: joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <82e42f8a-7f97-4016-ba55-1f460defef26@kernel.dk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.1

hi,

On 11/8/20 7:16 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:

hi,

A gentle reminder. How does this patch set look now?
I think the first patch looks ok at least.


I have applied 1/2 for now, I agree that one looks fine and should get
applied. I'll go over 2/2 soonish.

Thanks :)

Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
  - From: Xiaoguang Wang
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
  - From: Xiaoguang Wang
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 0/3] Add support of iopoll for dm device
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: don't take percpu_ref operations for registered files in IOPOLL mode
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
Next by thread: KASAN: use-after-free Write in io_submit_sqes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux