Re: Question about patch "io_uring: add submission polling"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/16/20 2:55 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> hi,
> 
> I have questions about below code comments, which was included in patch
> "io_uring: add submission polling",
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>      /*
>       * Drop cur_mm before scheduling, we can't hold it for
>       * long periods (or over schedule()). Do this before
>       * adding ourselves to the waitqueue, as the unuse/drop
>       * may sleep.
>       */
>      if (cur_mm) {
>              unuse_mm(cur_mm);
>              mmput(cur_mm);
>              cur_mm = NULL;
>      }
> 
>      prepare_to_wait(&ctx->sqo_wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Stefano submited a patch "io_uring: prevent sq_thread from spinning when it should stop",
> I understand what issue Stefano fixed, but don't understand below comments.
> 
> Can anyone help to explain why we need to rop cur_mm before scheduling, or
> why we can't hold it for long periods (or over schedule()), and if we
> unuse/drop mm after adding ourselves to the waitqueue, what issue will
> happen when unuse/drop sleeps, thanks.

The not holding it too long it just trying to be nice. But we can't drop
it after we've done prepare_to_wait(), as that sets our task runstate to
a non-running state. This conflicts with with mmput(), which might
sleep.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux