On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 10/05, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The goal is this patch series is to decouple TWA_SIGNAL based task_work > > from real signals and signal delivery. > > I think TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL can have more users. Say, we can move > try_to_freeze() from get_signal() to tracehook_notify_signal(), kill > fake_signal_wake_up(), and remove freezing() from recalc_sigpending(). > > Probably the same for TIF_PATCH_PENDING, klp_send_signals() can use > set_notify_signal() rather than signal_wake_up(). Yes, that was my impression from the patch set too, when I accidentally noticed it. Jens, could you CC our live patching ML when you submit v4, please? It would be a nice cleanup. Thanks Miroslav
