Re: [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:37:49 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201005150438.6628-2-axboe@kernel.dk>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

Jens, sorry for delay..

On 10/05, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> All the callers currently do this, clean it up and move the clearing
> into tracehook_notify_resume() instead.

To me this looks like a good cleanup regardless.

Oleg.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
  - From: Jens Axboe
- [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] generic: IO_URING direct IO fsx test
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6] kernel: add task_sigpending() helper
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/6] tracehook: clear TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in tracehook_notify_resume()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux