On 05/09/2020 07:35, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/4/20 9:57 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 9/4/20 9:53 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 9/4/20 9:22 PM, nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am helping out with the netty io_uring integration, and came across >>>> some strange behaviour which seems like it might be a bug related to >>>> async offload of read/write iovecs. >>>> >>>> Basically a WRITEV SQE seems to fail reliably with -BADADDRESS when the >>>> IOSQE_ASYNC flag is set but works fine otherwise (everything else the >>>> same). This is with 5.9.0-rc3. >>> >>> Do you see it just on 5.9-rc3, or also 5.8? Just curious... But that is >>> very odd in any case, ASYNC writev is even part of the regular tests. >>> Any sort of deferral, be it explicit via ASYNC or implicit through >>> needing to retry, saves all the needed details to retry without >>> needing any of the original context. >>> >>> Can you narrow down what exactly is being written - like file type, >>> buffered/O_DIRECT, etc. What file system, what device is hosting it. >>> The more details the better, will help me narrow down what is going on. >> >> Forgot, also size of the IO (both total, but also number of iovecs in >> that particular request. >> >> Essentially all the details that I would need to recreate what you're >> seeing. > > Turns out there was a bug in the explicit handling, new in the current > -rc series. Can you try and add the below? Hah, absolutely the same patch was in a series I was going to send today, but with a note that it works by luck so not a bug. Apparently, it is :) BTW, const in iter->iov is guarding from such cases, yet another proof that const casts are evil. > > diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c > index 0d7be2e9d005..000ae2acfd58 100644 > --- a/fs/io_uring.c > +++ b/fs/io_uring.c > @@ -2980,14 +2980,15 @@ static inline int io_rw_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req, int rw, > bool force_nonblock) > { > struct io_async_rw *iorw = &req->io->rw; > + struct iovec *iov; > ssize_t ret; > > - iorw->iter.iov = iorw->fast_iov; > - ret = __io_import_iovec(rw, req, (struct iovec **) &iorw->iter.iov, > - &iorw->iter, !force_nonblock); > + iorw->iter.iov = iov = iorw->fast_iov; > + ret = __io_import_iovec(rw, req, &iov, &iorw->iter, !force_nonblock); > if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > return ret; > > + iorw->iter.iov = iov; > io_req_map_rw(req, iorw->iter.iov, iorw->fast_iov, &iorw->iter); > return 0; > } > -- Pavel Begunkov