Re: [PATCH for-next] io_uring: allow non-fixed files with SQPOLL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:11 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The restriction of needing fixed files for SQPOLL is problematic, and
> prevents/inhibits several valid uses cases.
>
> There's no real good reason for us not to allow it, except we need to
> have the sqpoll thread inherit current->files from the task that setup
> the ring. We can't easily do that, since we'd introduce a circular
> reference by holding on to our own file table.
>
> If we wait for the sqpoll thread to exit when the ring fd is closed,
> then we can safely reference the task files_struct without holding
> a reference to it. And once we inherit that in the SQPOLL thread, we
> can support non-fixed files for SQPOLL.
[...]
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
[...]
> +       /*
> +        * For SQPOLL usage - no reference is held to this file table, we
> +        * rely on fops->flush() and our callback there waiting for the users
> +        * to finish.
> +        */
> +       struct files_struct     *sqo_files;
[...]
> @@ -6621,6 +6622,10 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
>
>         old_cred = override_creds(ctx->creds);
>
> +       task_lock(current);
> +       current->files = ctx->sqo_files;
> +       task_unlock(current);
[...]
> @@ -7549,6 +7557,13 @@ static int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>                 if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>                         goto err;
>
> +               /*
> +                * We will exit the sqthread before current exits, so we can
> +                * avoid taking a reference here and introducing weird
> +                * circular dependencies on the files table.
> +                */
> +               ctx->sqo_files = current->files;
[...]
> @@ -8239,8 +8254,10 @@ static int io_uring_flush(struct file *file, void *data)
>         /*
>          * If the task is going away, cancel work it may have pending
>          */
> -       if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || (current->flags & PF_EXITING))
> +       if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || (current->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
> +               io_sq_thread_stop(ctx);
>                 io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_task_cb, current, true);
> +       }

What happens when the uring setup syscall fails around
io_uring_get_fd() (after the sq offload thread was started, but before
an fd was installed)? Will that also properly wait for the sq_thread
to go away before returning from the syscall (at which point the
files_struct could disappear)?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux