Re: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: use TWA_SIGNAL for task_work if the task isn't running

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:12 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/10/20 3:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:06:49PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> >> should work as far as I can tell, but I don't even know if there's a
> >> reliable way to do task_in_kernel().
> >
> > Only on NOHZ_FULL, and tracking that is one of the things that makes it
> > so horribly expensive.
>
> Probably no other way than to bite the bullet and just use TWA_SIGNAL
> unconditionally...

Why are you trying to avoid using TWA_SIGNAL? Is there a specific part
of handling it that's particularly slow?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux