Re: [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: fix io_fail_links() locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/30/20 6:20 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 86b71d0daee05 ("io_uring: deduplicate freeing linked timeouts")
> actually fixed one bug, where io_fail_links() doesn't consider
> REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED, but added another -- io_cqring_fill_event()
> without any locking
> 
> Return locking back there and do it right with REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED
> check.

Something like the below is much better, and it also makes it so that
the static analyzers don't throw a fit. I'm going to fold this into
the original.


diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e1410ff31892..a0aea78162a6 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 /*
  * Called if REQ_F_LINK_HEAD is set, and we fail the head request
  */
-static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void __io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 
@@ -1620,6 +1620,23 @@ static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 }
 
+static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED)) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+		__io_fail_links(req);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+	} else {
+		__io_fail_links(req);
+	}
+
+	io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+}
+
 static void io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
 	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)))

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux