On 6/30/20 6:41 AM, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > For example, there are multiple sqes recv with the same connection. > When there is no data in the connection, the reqs of these sqes will > be armed poll. Then if only a little data is received, only one req > receives the data, and the other reqs get EAGAIN again. However, > due to this flags REQ_F_POLLED, these reqs cannot enter the > io_arm_poll_handler function. These reqs will be put into wq by > io_queue_async_work, and the flags passed by io_wqe_worker when recv > is called are BLOCK, which may make io_wqe_worker enter schedule in the > network protocol stack. When the main process of io_uring exits, > these io_wqe_workers still cannot exit. The connection will not be > actively released until the connection is closed by the peer. > > So we should allow req to arm poll again. I was actually pondering this when I wrote it, and was worried about potential performance implications from only allowing a single trigger of the poll side. But only for performance reasons, I'm puzzled as to why this would cause a cancelation issue. Why can't the workers exit? It's expected to be waiting in there, and it should be interruptible sleep. Do you have more details on the test case, maybe even a reproducer for this? -- Jens Axboe
