Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] io_uring: change the poll events to be 32-bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/11/20 8:30 PM, Jiufei Xue wrote:
> poll events should be 32-bits to cover EPOLLEXCLUSIVE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c                 | 4 ++--
>  include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 2 +-
>  tools/io_uring/liburing.h     | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 47790a2..6250227 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -4602,7 +4602,7 @@ static void io_poll_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
>  static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>  {
>  	struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
> -	u16 events;
> +	u32 events;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -8196,7 +8196,7 @@ static int __init io_uring_init(void)
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, /* compat */   int, rw_flags);
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, /* compat */ __u32, rw_flags);
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u32,  fsync_flags);
> -	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u16,  poll_events);
> +	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u32,  poll_events);
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u32,  sync_range_flags);
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u32,  msg_flags);
>  	BUILD_BUG_SQE_ELEM(28, __u32,  timeout_flags);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index 92c2269..afc7edd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
>  	union {
>  		__kernel_rwf_t	rw_flags;
>  		__u32		fsync_flags;
> -		__u16		poll_events;
> +		__u32		poll_events;
>  		__u32		sync_range_flags;
>  		__u32		msg_flags;
>  		__u32		timeout_flags;

We obviously have the space in there as most other flag members are 32-bits, but
I'd want to double check if we're not changing the ABI here. Is this always
going to be safe, on any platform, regardless of endianess etc?


-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux