On 5/17/20 5:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > [2] fixes FORCE_ASYNC. I don't want to go through every bit, so > not sure whether this is an actual issue with [1], but it's just > safer this way. Please, consider it for-5.7 LGTM, applied. -- Jens Axboe
On 5/17/20 5:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > [2] fixes FORCE_ASYNC. I don't want to go through every bit, so > not sure whether this is an actual issue with [1], but it's just > safer this way. Please, consider it for-5.7 LGTM, applied. -- Jens Axboe
![]() |