Hi Jens, Sorry for the late. On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 08:17:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/10/20 12:09 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote: > > On 4/10/2020 10:51 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > >> On 10/04/2020 19:54, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote: > >>>> As I see, this down_read() from the trace is > >>>> down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem), where current->mm is set by use_mm() > >>>> just several lines above your change. So, what do you mean by passing? I > >>>> don't see do_madvise() __explicitly__ accepting mm as an argument. > >>> I think the sequence is: > >>> > >>> io_madvise() > >>> -> do_madvise(NULL, req->work.mm, ma->addr, ma->len, ma->advice) > >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >>> -> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) > >>> > >>> I added an assert in do_madvise() for a NULL mm value and hit it running the test. > >>> > >>>> What tree do you use? Extra patches on top? > >>> I'm using next-20200409 with no patches. > >> I see, it came from 676a179 ("mm: pass task and mm to do_madvise"), which isn't > >> in Jen's tree. > >> > >> I don't think your patch will do, because it changes mm refcounting with extra > >> mmdrop() in io_req_work_drop_env(). That's assuming it worked well before. > >> > >> Better fix then is to make it ```do_madvise(NULL, current->mm, ...)``` > >> as it actually was at some point in the mentioned patch (v5). > >> > > Ok. Jens had suggested to use req->work.mm in the patch comments so > > let's just get him to confirm: > > > > "I think we want to use req->work.mm here - it'll be the same as > > current->mm at this point, but it makes it clear that we're using a > > grabbed mm." > > We should just use current->mm, as that matches at that point anyway > since IORING_OP_MADVISE had needs_mm set. > > Minchan, can you please make that change? Do you mean this? diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index a9537cd77aeb..3edbb4764993 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -3280,7 +3280,7 @@ static int io_madvise(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock) if (force_nonblock) return -EAGAIN; - ret = do_madvise(NULL, req->work.mm, ma->addr, ma->len, ma->advice); + ret = do_madvise(NULL, current->mm, ma->addr, ma->len, ma->advice); if (ret < 0) req_set_fail_links(req); io_cqring_add_event(req, ret); Since I have a plan to resend whole patchset again, I will carry on that.