Re: [PATCH 0/4] timeout and sequence fixes

[Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/14/20 3:39 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> [4/4] is dirty, but fixes the issue. And there is still "SQ vs CQ"
> problem, solving which can effectively revert it, so I suggest to
> postpone the last patch for a while. I'll rebase if it'd be necessary.
> 

Thanks, I've applied 1-3 for now. Looks good to me, and also tests out
fine.

-- 
Jens Axboe