Re: io_uring's openat doesn't work with large (2G+) files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:29 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/8/20 8:50 PM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:26 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/8/20 9:12 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:49 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/8/20 8:41 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:36 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 4/8/20 8:30 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:19 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 4/8/20 7:51 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring's openat seems to produce FDs that are incompatible with
> >>>>>>>>> large files (>2GB). If a file (smaller than 2GB) is opened using
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring's openat then writes -- both using io_uring and just sync
> >>>>>>>>> pwrite() -- past that threshold fail with EFBIG. If such a file is
> >>>>>>>>> opened with sync openat, then both io_uring's writes and sync writes
> >>>>>>>>> succeed. And if the file is larger than 2GB then io_uring's openat
> >>>>>>>>> fails right away, while the sync one works.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Kernel versions: 5.6.0-rc2, 5.6.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> A couple of reproducers attached, one demos successful open with
> >>>>>>>>> failed writes afterwards, and another failing open (in comparison with
> >>>>>>>>> sync  calls).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The output of the former one for example:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *** sync openat
> >>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 0
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 4294967296
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *** sync openat
> >>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 0
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 4294967296
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *** io_uring openat
> >>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 0
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 4294967296
> >>>>>>>>> write failed: File too large
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *** io_uring openat
> >>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 0
> >>>>>>>>> write succeeded
> >>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 4294967296
> >>>>>>>>> write failed: File too large
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Can you try with this one? Seems like only openat2 gets it set,
> >>>>>>>> not openat...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've tried specifying O_LARGEFILE explicitly, that did not change the
> >>>>>>> behavior. Is this good enough? Much faster for me to check this way
> >>>>>>> that rebuilding the kernel. But if necessary I can do that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not sure O_LARGEFILE settings is going to do it for x86-64, the patch
> >>>>>> should fix it though. Might have worked on 32-bit, though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK, will test.
> >>>>
> >>>> Great, thanks. FWIW, tested here, and it works for me.
> >>>
> >>> Great, will post results tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > With the patch applied it works perfectly, thanks.
>
> Thanks for testing!

Can I ask if this is going to be merged into 5.6? Since it's a bug
(important enough from my perspective) in existing logic. Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux