Re: [PATCH 9/9] io_uring: pass submission ref to async

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/2/2020 6:12 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/2/20 8:08 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 3/2/2020 12:39 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2020 19:18, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> Currenlty, every async work handler accepts a submission reference,
>>>> which it should put. Also there is a reference grabbed in io_get_work()
>>>> and dropped in io_put_work(). This patch merge them together.
>>>>
>>>> - So, ownership of the submission reference passed to io-wq, and it'll
>>>> be put in io_put_work().
>>>> - io_get_put() doesn't take a ref now and so deleted.
>>>> - async handlers don't put the submission ref anymore.
>>>> - make cancellation bits of io-wq to call {get,put}_work() handlers
>>>
>>> Hmm, it makes them more like {init,fini}_work() and unbalanced/unpaired. May be
>>> no a desirable thing.
>>
>> Any objections against replacing {get,put}_work() with
>> io_finilise_work()? It will be called once and only once, and a work
>> must not go away until it happened. It will be enough for now, but not
>> sure whether you have some plans for this get/put pinning.
> 
> I have no further plans there, the get/put work only exist to ensure that
> the work item stays valid in case of cancelation lookups.

Great, it'll go into v2 as well.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux