Re: [PATCH 0/5] random io-wq and io_uring bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/28/20 12:36 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> A bunch of unconnected patches, easy and straightworward.
> Probably could even be picked separately.
> 
> The only thing could be of concern is [PATCH 4/5]. I assumed that
> work setup is short (switch creds, mm, fs, files with task_[un]lock),
> and arm a timeout after it's done.
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (5):
>   io_uring: clean io_poll_complete
>   io_uring: extract kmsg copy helper
>   io-wq: remove unused IO_WQ_WORK_HAS_MM
>   io_uring: remove IO_WQ_WORK_CB
>   io-wq: use BIT for ulong hash
> 
>  fs/io-wq.c    | 11 +++--------
>  fs/io-wq.h    |  2 --
>  fs/io_uring.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

LGTM, and always love a negative diffstat. Applied for 5.7.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux