Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/02/2020 11:30, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> *on top of for-5.6*

Jens, let me know if this and the splice patchset should be rebased onto
your poll branch.

> 
> This cleans up io-wq punting paths, doing small fixes and removing
> unnecessary logic from different submission paths.
> 
> v2:
> - remove pid-related comment, as it's fixed separately
> - make ("add missing io_req_cancelled()") first
>   in the series, so it may be picked for 5.6
> 
> v3:
> - rebase + drop a patch definitely colliding with poll work
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (3):
>   io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx
>   io_uring: don't do full *prep_worker() from io-wq
>   io_uring: remove req->in_async
> 
>  fs/io_uring.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux