Re: [PATCH 7/9] io_uring: add per-task callback handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/02/2020 17:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/21/20 6:51 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 20/02/2020 23:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> For poll requests, it's not uncommon to link a read (or write) after
>>> the poll to execute immediately after the file is marked as ready.
>>> Since the poll completion is called inside the waitqueue wake up handler,
>>> we have to punt that linked request to async context. This slows down
>>> the processing, and actually means it's faster to not use a link for this
>>> use case.
>>>
>>> We also run into problems if the completion_lock is contended, as we're
>>> doing a different lock ordering than the issue side is. Hence we have
>>> to do trylock for completion, and if that fails, go async. Poll removal
>>> needs to go async as well, for the same reason.
>>>
>>> eventfd notification needs special case as well, to avoid stack blowing
>>> recursion or deadlocks.
>>>
>>> These are all deficiencies that were inherited from the aio poll
>>> implementation, but I think we can do better. When a poll completes,
>>> simply queue it up in the task poll list. When the task completes the
>>> list, we can run dependent links inline as well. This means we never
>>> have to go async, and we can remove a bunch of code associated with
>>> that, and optimizations to try and make that run faster. The diffstat
>>> speaks for itself.
>>
>> So, it piggybacks request execution onto a random task, that happens
>> to complete a poll. Did I get it right?
>>
>> I can't find where it setting right mm, creds, etc., or why it have
>> them already.
> 
> Not a random task, the very task that initially tried to do the receive
> (or whatever the operation may be). Hence there's no need to set
> mm/creds/whatever, we're still running in the context of the original
> task once we retry the operation after the poll signals readiness.

Got it. Then, it may happen in the future after returning from
__io_arm_poll_handler() and io_uring_enter(). And by that time io_submit_sqes()
should have already restored creds (i.e. personality stuff) on the way back.
This might be a problem.

BTW, Is it by design, that all requests of a link use personality creds
specified in the head's sqe?

-- 
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux