Re: crash on connect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/20/20 11:45 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:28 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/20/20 9:52 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:39 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/20/20 9:34 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:29 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/20/20 9:17 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/20/20 7:19 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi there, me again
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kernel is at 043f0b67f2ab8d1af418056bc0cc6f0623d31347
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This test is easier to explain: it essentially issues a connect and a
>>>>>>>> shutdown right away.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It currently fails due to no fault of io_uring. But every now and then
>>>>>>>> it crashes (you may have to run more than once to get it to crash)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Instructions are similar to my last test.
>>>>>>>> Except the test to build is now "tests/unit/connect_test"
>>>>>>>> Code is at git@xxxxxxxxxx:glommer/seastar.git  branch io-uring-connect-crash
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Run it with ./build/release/tests/unit/connect_test -- -c1
>>>>>>>> --reactor-backend=uring
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Backtrace attached
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perfect thanks, I'll take a look!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haven't managed to crash it yet, but every run complains:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> got to shutdown of 10 with refcnt: 2
>>>>>> Refs being all dropped, calling forget for 10
>>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'fmt::v6::format_error'
>>>>>>   what():  argument index out of range
>>>>>> unknown location(0): fatal error: in "unixdomain_server": signal: SIGABRT (application abort requested)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if that's causing it not to fail here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, that means it "passed". (I was in the process of figuring out
>>>>> where I got this wrong when I started seeing the crashes)
>>>>
>>>> Can you do, in your kernel dir:
>>>>
>>>> $ gdb vmlinux
>>>> [...]
>>>> (gdb) l *__io_queue_sqe+0x4a
>>>>
>>>> and see what it says?
>>>
>>> 0xffffffff81375ada is in __io_queue_sqe (fs/io_uring.c:4814).
>>> 4809 struct io_kiocb *linked_timeout;
>>> 4810 struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
>>> 4811 int ret;
>>> 4812
>>> 4813 again:
>>> 4814 linked_timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(req);
>>> 4815
>>> 4816 ret = io_issue_sqe(req, sqe, &nxt, true);
>>> 4817
>>> 4818 /*
>>>
>>> (I am not using timeouts, just async_cancel)
>>
>> Can't seem to hit it here, went through thousands of iterations...
>> I'll keep trying.
>>
>> If you have time, you can try and enable CONFIG_KASAN=y and see if
>> you can hit it with that.
> 
> I can
> 
> Attaching full dmesg

Can you try the latest? It's sha d8154e605f84. Before you do, can you
do the lookup on __io_queue_sqe+0x639 with gdb?

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux