On 2/10/20 8:45 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> It crashes all the same
>
> New backtrace attached - looks very similar to the old one, although
> not identical.
I missed the other spot we do the same thing... Try this.
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 182aa17dc2ca..b8ef5a5483de 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -1115,12 +1116,15 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
for_each_node(node) {
struct io_wqe *wqe;
+ int alloc_node = node;
- wqe = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct io_wqe), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ if (!node_online(alloc_node))
+ alloc_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ wqe = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct io_wqe), GFP_KERNEL, alloc_node);
if (!wqe)
goto err;
wq->wqes[node] = wqe;
- wqe->node = node;
+ wqe->node = alloc_node;
wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].max_workers = bounded;
atomic_set(&wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].nr_running, 0);
if (wq->user) {
@@ -1128,7 +1132,6 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
}
atomic_set(&wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].nr_running, 0);
- wqe->node = node;
wqe->wq = wq;
spin_lock_init(&wqe->lock);
INIT_WQ_LIST(&wqe->work_list);
--
Jens Axboe
