On 1/31/20 8:37 AM, Glauber Costa wrote: > There are situations where one does not have a ring initialized yet, and > yet they may want to know which opcodes are supported before doing so. > > We have recently introduced io_uring_get_probe(io_uring*) to do a > similar task when the ring already exists. Because this was committed > recently and this hasn't seen a release, I thought I would just go ahead > and change that to io_uring_get_probe_ring(io_uring*), because I suck at > finding another meaningful name for this case (io_uring_get_probe_noring > sounded way too ugly to me) > > A minimal ring is initialized and torn down inside the function. Thing of beauty, applied, thanks. -- Jens Axboe
