On 1/31/20 8:00 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> There are situations where one does not have a ring initialized yet, and
> yet they may want to know which opcodes are supported before doing so.
>
> We have recently introduced io_uring_get_probe(io_uring*) to do a
> similar task when the ring already exists. Because this was committed
> recently and this hasn't seen a release, I thought I would just go ahead
> and change that to io_uring_get_probe_ring(io_uring*), because I suck at
> finding another meaningful name for this case (io_uring_get_probe_noring
> sounded way too ugly to me)
>
> A minimal ring is initialized and torn down inside the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glauber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/include/liburing.h | 4 +++-
> src/liburing.map | 1 +
> src/setup.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> test/probe.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h
> index 39db902..aa11282 100644
> --- a/src/include/liburing.h
> +++ b/src/include/liburing.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ struct io_uring {
> * return an allocated io_uring_probe structure, or NULL if probe fails (for
> * example, if it is not available). The caller is responsible for freeing it
> */
> -extern struct io_uring_probe *io_uring_get_probe(struct io_uring *ring);
> +extern struct io_uring_probe *io_uring_get_probe_ring(struct io_uring *ring);
> +/* same as io_uring_get_probe_ring, but takes care of ring init and teardown */
> +extern struct io_uring_probe *io_uring_get_probe();
Include 'void' for no parameter.
> @@ -186,3 +186,16 @@ fail:
> free(probe);
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +struct io_uring_probe *io_uring_get_probe() {
void here as well, and new line before the opening bracket.
Minor stuff, rest looks fine to me.
--
Jens Axboe
