On 1/29/20 4:38 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 02:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/29/20 4:19 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2020 01:44, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 1/29/20 3:37 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>> FYI, for-next
>>>>>
>>>>> fs/io_uring.c: In function ‘io_epoll_ctl’:
>>>>> fs/io_uring.c:2661:22: error: ‘IO_WQ_WORK_NEEDS_FILES’ undeclared (first use in
>>>>> this function)
>>>>> 2661 | req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_NEEDS_FILES;
>>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> fs/io_uring.c:2661:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>>>> for each function it appears in
>>>>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:266: fs/io_uring.o] Error 1
>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:1693: fs] Error 2
>>>>
>>>> Oops thanks, forgot that the epoll bits aren't in the 5.6 main branch
>>>> yet, but they are in for-next. I'll fix it up there, thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great. Also, it seems revert of ("io_uring: only allow submit from owning task
>>> ") didn't get into for-next nor for-5.6/io_uring-vfs.
>>
>> That's on purpose, didn't want to fold that in since it's already in
>> master. Once this goes out to Linus (tomorrow/Friday), then it'll
>> be resolved there.
>
> I see, thanks
I know it's a little annoying for testing, but it keeps the mainline
history a bit cleaner. Hopefully it'll all be moot in a few days.
--
Jens Axboe
