Re: [PATCH 0/2] io-wq sharing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/01/2020 03:06, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> rip-off of Jens io-wq sharing patches allowing multiple io_uring
> instances to be bound to a single io-wq. The differences are:
> - io-wq, which we would like to be shared, is passed as io_uring fd
> - fail, if can't share. IMHO, it's always better to fail fast and loud
> 
> I didn't tested it after rebasing, but hopefully won't be a problem.
> 

Ahh, wrong version. Sorry for that

> p.s. on top of ("io_uring/io-wq: don't use static creds/mm assignments")
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (2):
>   io-wq: allow grabbing existing io-wq
>   io_uring: add io-wq workqueue sharing
> 
>  fs/io-wq.c                    | 10 ++++++
>  fs/io-wq.h                    |  1 +
>  fs/io_uring.c                 | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h |  4 ++-
>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux