Re: [PATCH] io_uring: drain next sqe instead of shadowing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/21/19 7:28 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>
>>> Was that a reviewed-by from you? It'd be nice to get these more
>>> formally so I can add the attributes. I'll drop the other patch.
>>
>> I want to do more tests. There is no test machine at this time, at least
>> until tomorrow morning.
>>
> BTW, aside from the locking problem, that it fixes another one. If
> allocation for a shadow req is failed, io_submit_sqes() just continues
> without it ignoring draining.

Indeed. BTW, your commit message is way too weak for this patch. It
doesn't explain why we're making this change at all. I'm going to fix
it up.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux