Re: io_uring: io_fail_links() should only consider first linked timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2019 5:03 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
> I see, thanks.
> As for me, it may better return -EINVAL in advance so as to skip a lot unnecessary code for those reqs.
> 
Hah, I removed similar check just yesterday (see [PATCH 3/4] "io_uring:
remove redundant check"). We don't care about performance of invalid
requests, and this one in hot-path. The fewer edge cases, the better.

Also, for the example below, I'd want to fail INVALID_REQ and cancel
valid ones, but not exit after processing invalid, or even worse
processing the rest without it.

INVALID_REQ -> VALID_REQ -> VALID_REQ.

> @@ -3176,6 +3176,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
> 
>                 if (!io_get_sqring(ctx, &req->submit)) {
> 		}
> ...
> +               if (unlikely(req_is_invalid(req)))
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux