By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 8658c02e92f1..d64c393bf42c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5418,7 +5418,9 @@ static void bxt_de_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, 0);
/* Timeout 200us */
- if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) == 0, 1))
+ if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+ BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK, 0,
+ 1))
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for DE PLL unlock\n");
dev_priv->cdclk_pll.vco = 0;
--
2.8.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
