Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use atomic waits for short non-atomic ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:55:28PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:29:33PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > How would you implement it with cpu_clock? What would you do when
> > re-scheduled?
> 
> unsigned long base;
> int cpu;
> int ret;
> 
> preempt_disable();
> cpu = smp_processor_id();
> base = local_clock() >> 10;
> for (;;) {
> 	u64 now = local_clock() >> 10;
> 	preempt_enable();
> 
> 	if (COND) {
> 		ret = 0;
> 		break;
> 	}
> 
> 	if (now - base >= timeout) {
> 		ret = -ETIMEOUT;
> 		break;
> 	}
> 	
> 	cpu_relax();
> 
> 	preempt_disable();
> 	if (unlikely(cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
> 		timeout -= now - base;

For this, we should scale everything to ns (u64).
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux