Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:34:16PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:25:27PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Would it be possible for writing timing requirement tests for individual
> updates of planes on the same CRTC? E.g. making sure that legacy cursor
> doesn't block pageflips and vice versa. Also extending that to
> independent updates of primary vs sprite planes?

I guess all that should be doable.

I was also thinking we should at least have some kind of basic
performance benchmark for atomic ioctls. Eg. do TEST_ONLY ioctls
with different sets of properties and make sure we don't totally
suck.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux