Op 08-06-16 om 16:52 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:47:48PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 08-06-16 om 15:35 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>> Op 08-06-16 om 15:12 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:25:32PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>>>> This reduces the runtime of the tests from ~200s on my 30 fps 4k panel >>>>>> to 10s. >>>>> Does it still find the problem reliably on CHV pipe C (if you remove the >>>>> kernel w/a)? >>>> Yeah, a single coordinate is enough to trigger the fifo underrun. Rest is probably still slightly overkill. :) >>> Hmm. IIRC it wasn't quite that easy to trigger on my CHV. Sometime >>> it survived for a few iterations. But I'm too lazy to retest it now, >>> so I'll take your word for it. >>> >> Weird, even kms_cursor_crc random test triggered it for me on the first try with negative coordinates. > Might be that I'm only recalling the visual feedback. That is, maybe I > sometimes failed to see the underrun even though it did happen. > Can I take this as a r-b? _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
